- Family Law
- Labor and Employment Law
- Bankruptcy
- Real Estate
- Personal Injury
- Immigration
- Wills and Probate
- Business Law
- Consumer Law
- Medical Malpractice
- Automobile Accident
- Care for an Aging Relative
- Get Divorced
- Identity Theft
- Privacy Violated
- Welcome a Child
- Write a Will
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
Criminal Law: Witnesses FAQ
Lawyers.comsm
Prosecutors must disclose the informant's identity if the identify of the informant would be relevant or helpful to the defense, or essential to a fair determination of the case. Common examples of this are where the informant was an eyewitness to, or a participant in, any of the offenses that were charged.
An informant can be made to testify at either a pretrial hearing or at a trial. For example, if the informant's identity is ordered disclosed because she was the source of information for a search warrant, and was present and witnessed the illegal acts that resulted in the warrant being issued, the informant might have to testify as a witness at a hearing before trial in which the defense argues the warrant was improperly issued.
If the police or prosecutor don't want to reveal the identify of the informant, either for the informant's safety or so as not to "blow their cover" so the informant can be used in future cases, they'll go to great lengths to avoid having the informant testify. But in the end, it's up to the judge, who'll balance the request not to disclose the informant's identity against the constitutional rights of the accused to present a defense and to have a fair trial.
Witnesses aren't the property of either party, and both parties ought to have equal access.
Depending on how long ago the conviction occurred, the witness could be confronted with it in front of the jury. This is called "impeachment."
In many states, the judge can instruct the jury that they may consider the witness's prior felony conviction in deciding how much credibility to give the witness's testimony.
If a witness lies and denies the existence of a prior felony conviction, he could be charged with perjury.
The judge also gives guidance on how jurors should determine the witness's credibility. Jurors are told to carefully judge all of the testimony given, and the circumstances under which each witness has testified. They're advised to consider:
Each juror should make his or her own judgment or assessment concerning the believability of a witness, and then attach the importance or weight to that testimony that he or she believes it deserves.
If the witness is an informant, someone who provides evidence against someone else for money, or to escape punishment for his or her own misdeeds or crimes, or for other personal reason or advantage, the jurors are instructed to examine and weigh their testimony with greater care than the testimony of a witness who doesn't have such motivations.
The purpose of perjury statutes is to keep the process of justice free from contamination of false testimony. Perjury is considered a serious affront to courts and the administration of justice.
The best-known form of perjury is falsely answering a question while testifying as a witness at a trial. Before you could be found guilty of perjury, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you knew what the question meant and that you gave knowingly untruthful and misleading answers in response to the questions. In other words, your knowledge and reasonable understanding as to what was meant by the person asking the question is critical to deciding whether you committed perjury. The government has to prove your statement was false at the time you made it. False testimony that is an honest mistake isn't perjury.
In addition to perjury being a crime in itself, a defendant can receive increased punishment under the United States sentencing guidelines for providing a materially false state to a judge, law enforcement officer, or probation officer.
If you're going to take an oath to tell the truth, it's important that you do so.
Q: Do I have a duty to cooperate with police?
Return to index . . .
Q: Can a confidential informant be made to testify in court?
Return to index . . .
Q: Is someone with a felony conviction allowed to testify?
Return to index . . .
Q: What happens when a witness admits they lied to the court?
Return to index . . .
Q: Can I go to jail for committing perjury?
Return to index . . .
Q: Can a husband or wife be forced to testify against his or her spouse?
probate estate
all of a deceased person’s estate that is administered under the jurisdiction of the probate court
THE NATION; Dismissal is sought in MySpace case; A Missouri woman is accused of using a fake persona to bully a 13-year-old girl who later killed he...
The criminal charges against a Missouri woman accused of using a fake MySpace persona to bully a 13-year-old girl should be dismissed because there is...L.A. sues financial firms, alleging fraud in bond issues
Bid-rigging and other alleged fraud by investment banks and insurance companies allegedly cost Los Angeles taxpayers tens of millions of dollars, according...Bush yields on housing bill, which now goes to Senate
The House approved a sweeping plan Wednesday to ease the country's most serious housing crisis since the Great Depression by providing aid to homeowners...More Legal News