Social Host Alcohol Liability

Sherrie Bennett

Are you hosting a party, but concerned about the possibility of excess drinking and being responsible for the resulting damage and injury? Here's a quick look at your potential liability and what you can do to prevent it.

Unless you sell liquor for a living, you're unlikely to be responsible for any injury caused by drunk employees under what are called "dram shop" laws. These laws generally only apply to commercial vendors of alcohol, such as bars, restaurants and package stores.

A drunk person cannot collect for injury to himself, but a third party injured by the actions of a drunk person can collect from a social host under certain circumstances. This is especially important when the drunk person has little or no insurance to cover a serious or fatal injury.

Laws vary widely by state, with some states not imposing any liability at all on social hosts. Other states limit responsibility of social hosts to injury that occurs on the premises where the party is being held. Other states extend social hosts' liability to injuries from traffic accidents involving the person to whom they served alcohol.

Most states impose liability on social hosts where:

  • Alcohol is served to a minor
  • The host was reckless in serving alcohol or should have recognized the extent of the guest's intoxication and not served him or her more alcohol

Whether or not a host is "reckless" in serving alcohol will always be a factual issue to be decided by a judge or jury. A social host should never serve a minor or encourage guests to drink excessively. And whether or not the social event involves business associates and employees, a social host shouldn't continue to serve a guest after they are "visibly intoxicated" and/or it becomes obvious that they've had too much to drink and their judgment or physical coordination is impaired.

Many states also impose liability specifically where the host is an employer and the event involves a business purpose. While laws vary greatly depending on the state, the employer host generally has a greater duty to the employee guest, due to the nature of the relationship and the perception that an employee may feel obligated to attend an office party more than some other social event.

Preventative Steps

Although the focus of your party should be on entertaining, there are many things you can do to lessen the possibility you'll be held responsible for your guest's actions after drinking too much.

Make sure no minors are served.

If possible, host the event at a restaurant or bar licensed to serve alcohol, where professional waiters can monitor alcohol intake and politely cut off anyone they perceive has had enough to drink.

Another alternative is to provide everything except the liquor, and host a cash bar. That way, guests have purchased the alcohol themselves, and you are somewhat removed from being accused of furnishing the alcohol directly to your guests.

Discourage guests from drinking excessively, and stop serving anyone who appears visibly intoxicated.

Encourage employees to use designated drivers and provide alternative forms of transportation, such as free taxis. Rather than letting someone wander out the door in an obvious intoxicated state, it makes sense to enlist another guest headed in their direction to drive them home.

In extreme circumstances, you may have to take your guest's car keys and insist they sleep over.

A little prevention can go a long way, and may even save someone's life.

Related Resources on Lawyers.com
- DUI DWI Defenses
- Driving While Intoxicated FAQ
- DUI/DWI articles and information
- Selecting a Good Criminal Lawyer
- Find a Criminal Lawyer in your area
- Visit our Criminal Law Message Board for more help
Employment Law to Intellectual Property: Every Legal Issue. One Legal Source. Lawyers.com

promissory estoppel

an estoppel that prevents a promisor from denying the existence of a promise when the promisee reasonably and foreseeably relies on the promise and to his or her loss acts or fails to act and suffers an injustice that can only be avoided by enforcement of the promise

TOYS; Bratz falls to its rival in court; Barbie maker Mattel may be on verge of a large damage award.

In the battle of the doll makers, the house that Barbie built won a sweeping court victory Thursday, accessories and all.

Suit could alter sport's landscape; Hamburg Masters defending its turf in antitrust dispute with ATP

Just two weeks after one of the most memorable finals in Wimbledon history, men's tennis faces a $76.

Missouri executions ruled constitutional

A federal judge has tossed a lawsuit challenging Missouri's lethal injection method, ruling the state's protocol for executions is constitutional.

More Legal News


Terms & Conditions   Privacy   Copyright © 2008 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.