This commonly asked question was answered in the case of People v. Wells, 38 Cal.4th
1078 (2006). In that case an anonymous caller in Kern County reported a
possibly intoxicated driver ?weaving all over the roadway in a 1980s model blue van. The van was
reportedly traveling northbound on Highway 99 at Airport Drive, north of Bakersfield. A CHP officer
who heard the report happened to be only 3 or 4 miles north of that location, and he knew there was
only one exit between him and the location. He waited and, 2 to 3 minutes later, a northbound blue
1980s-era van passed him. Although the police officer observed no weaving, speeding or other
traffic violation, he stopped the van on suspicion of DUI.
The Court found that the anonymous call was sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion
for the stop. A blue 1980s van is a fairly distinctive vehicle, so the officer could reasonably
believe it was the vehicle described. In addition, the Court noted that a drunk driver poses a far
more grave and immediate risk to the public than a person who passively possesses a gun (as was the
allegation in a previously decided case called "J.L".). As in previous cases, the Court
also pointed out that a traffic stop is much less intrusive and embarrassing than a frisk conducted
on a public street (which is what occurred in J.L.). Any doubts regarding the reliability or
sincerity of the tipster were reduced by the fact the tip came via a phoned-in report of a
contemporaneous act of recklessly driving presumably viewed by the caller. Moreover, the officer
confirmed the relatively precise and accurate description given by the tipster the type of vehicle
as well as its color, location and direction of travel within minutes of the report, which also
enhanced the reliability of the tip. Despite seeming similarities to J.L., the Court concluded a
different result was warranted in this case.
A
Bakersfield DUI Attorney can help
evaluate the facts in any particular case to determine if they comport with the law.