| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerMost Recent Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer Archive |

In cases in which criminals were given a deferred sentence, as the Providence
Journal reports, such as no-contest or a guilty plea, the the House in R.I. has
overwhelmingly voted to remove the records from public view. As long as the person stays
out of trouble
for five years, their criminal history and the severity of the crime committed
would be inaccessible. Proponents argue
that it helps people with youthful indiscretions get better jobs while
opponents argue that sealed records are not limited to nonviolent crimes by
youth or first-time offenders.
