You've decided you don't want to deal with the consequences of a speeding ticket such as fines and insurance rate increases. What can you do to prepare yourself and your attorney to successfully defend your case?
You'll first need to find out whether your state's speeding laws involve "absolute" or "presumed" speed limits. In absolute speed limit states, you've violated the law if you drive even one mile above the posted speed limit. In presumed speed limit states, you're presumed to be breaking the law by going above the posted speed limit, and it's your burden to prove you were going at a safe speed for road and traffic conditions.
If you decide to contest a speeding ticket, it is important to scope out your options. If you ask correctly, you are entitled to receive copies of the evidence to be used against you through a process called "discovery." .
It's a good idea to go to traffic court ahead of your court date and observe trials similar to yours, so you understand the traffic trial process.
You'll want to gather together evidence to be used in your behalf. You might want to take photos of the intersection or stretch of road where you got the ticket at the same time of day you received the ticket (and under the same weather conditions if possible). It's especially important to get photos of any obstructions in the line of sight between your vehicle and the police vehicle, such as moving traffic, power lines, signs, bends in the road and so forth. You may also want to make a diagram of the scene, if you think it will help the judge understand your point of view.
You'll also want to contact any witnesses identified in the police report, as well as witnesses who may have been in the car with you.
Some general defenses to a speeding ticket in a presumed speed limit state include:
A radar system like the kind used by police to monitor traffic simply tells the operator how fast the vehicle with the most dominant reflective surface is going, but can't measure distance or pick out one moving vehicle among several. It's up to the officer to make that discretionary call.
One of the best defenses against readings from a radar unit is that the radar system picked up another vehicle or more reflective surface instead of your vehicle. Reflective or interfering surfaces can include:
One way to prove the possibility of an inaccurate radar reading due to obstructions is by using the photos you took of the scene to show that the officer would have had to "shoot" the radar through an object between his vehicle and yours.
A less reliable and more time-consuming defense is to try to prove that the radar system wasn't properly maintained and so it wasn't working properly. To prove this, you have to subpoena the maintenance records of the radar system, as well as the maintenance records of the tuning forks sometimes used to calibrate the radar systems. This isn't a defense you should attempt without an attorney to represent you.
Another radar system defense is to prove that the officer wasn't properly trained and qualified to operate a radar system, and in fact operated the radar improperly. You would have to have:
Laser speed guns used by police can measure distance and calculate speed by comparing the change in distance against a specific span of time. Fighting a laser gun speeding ticket is more difficult, as it's harder to claim the gun was measuring some object other than your vehicle.
Many of the defenses to speeding tickets are complex and technical, so it almost always makes sense to hire an attorney to represent you properly.
a clause in a constitution prohibiting the government from depriving a person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
More Legal News